The words of John Piper have often challenged me. Like a needle bumped, they scritch and scratch across the smooth, party line record of my Christian existence. 
He taught me that longing to be happy is a universal human experience, and it is good, not sinful. Scratch.
He taught me that my son’s real problem is not smoking, but rather that he doesn’t see Jesus clearly, and that the sins that distress me will only begin to fade away when he sees Jesus for who He really is. Scratch.
He taught me how to be a Christian Hedonist. Scratch.
So it’s no surprise that his words have the power to sustain a resonance from the Resurgence Conference last week. Namely, that it is good and right and Biblical to ask ”why”, and more astonishing, there should be a “why” to everything we believe. He bodaciously proclaimed that, “God is not honored by leaps in the dark.” This is a solid slap on the cheek (face and/or hiney, your choice) of what I call Shekinah Glory theology.
DISCLAIMER: God’s glory is worthy of study, and I think I understand it about as well as anyone can this side of heaven, so I am not being irreverant or intentionally flip. God’s glory is magnificent. As Jonathan Edwards put it: “The mind ascends to the truth of the gospel by a sight of its glory” (2 Cor. 4:3).
What I mean by Shekinah Glory theology is that faction of patty-cake Christianity that says, ”I-don’t-understand-and-none-of-us-can-or-ever-will-(or should?)-so-we-just-have-to-chuck-all-of-the-unknown-and-be-content-with-knowing-we’ll-understand-in-the-end”. This smacks of, “Just drink the Kool Aid, children.” So whatever reasonable questions our nonChristian friends and family bring, we tell them, “Fuhgeddaboutit!” Shekinah Glory takes over.
YES there is a whole conversation about God’s mystery and our pea brains fizzing out on trying to understand the magnitude of his thoughts. But explaining Jesus with a heavy Shekinah Glory bent is whacked in many realms, and as I thought about it, often a copout for putting in the hard labor of Bible study and theology homework. It’s just easier to roll off, “God knows.” (Disclaimer #2: Sometimes, that is the answer.)
Piper’s Scriptural arguments were thus:
1 Jn. 4:1 “Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirit to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.”
Acts 17:23 “For as I walked around and looked carefully at your objects of worship, I even found an altar with this inscription: TO AN UNKNOWN GOD. Now what you worship as something unknown I am going to proclaim to you.”
1 Jn. 5:13 “I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God so that you may know that you have eternal life.”
Acts 1:3 “After his suffering, he showed himself to these men and gave many convincing proofs…”
His point being that there is an organic connection between KNOWING and writing, KNOWING and hearing, KNOWING and reading. In essence, we can KNOW, and it’s okay (dare I say it’s good?), to ask “why”. There should be a why to everything we believe?
Scratch.